On Feb. 4, 2026, The Washington Post abruptly reduced its entire workforce, a move that shocked both its journalists and readers. These layoffs affected one-third of the company and saw cuts to sports and international news coverage, all with a goal of “increasing efficiency”. What remains of this news is a confused nation, specifically about how The Washington Post will operate in the wake of these cuts, and the emerging creatives in this country are even more concerned about their place in the working world, if that still exists. 

What exactly is happening in the job market that is leaving creatives increasingly afraid? There are several factors at play, which can all be boiled down to two major points: a relentless need for efficiency and no concern for intention. We’re seeing print media, broadcast and digital media either being rapidly merged or bought out by tycoons, as seen with The Washington Post, Time, CBS, Netflix, etc. This leads to outlets being run like businesses, optimizing short-term profit rather than what they truly are: journalistic enterprises aiming to serve and inform the public. The primary concern has now shifted from valuable storytelling to quick profits with no concern for a company’s employees or journalistic integrity. 

There are a few tangible examples of these efficiency efforts being put into practice today, with one of the main drivers of this movement being artificial intelligence (AI). AI is being optimized by almost every company these days — not limited to media outlets — to quickly filter job applications and eliminate candidates who may not be eligible. This impacts candidates in all disciplines, but especially young media professionals possessing soft skills and portfolios that demand an in-depth review by hiring managers. Pouring hours into applications, compiling years of work and preparing for interviews now feel obsolete in today’s job market. 

There is also the ever-present issue of oversaturation. This issue isn’t new, but in a market that is constantly merging within itself, it now takes months – or even years – to land a career remotely in your desired field. The result is a LinkedIn post with over 100 applicants within about an hour of publication and a negligible likelihood of hearing back from the company. Message boards are flooded with budding graphic designers, copywriters, photographers, videographers – all afraid and asking the same question: “Is my career still worth fighting for?” 

Everyone needs work experience to improve as a professional, but more than anyone, creatives are trapped in a landscape that feels set up to fail them. Jobs that may have seemed relatively stable a decade ago now seem out of reach. We now see more and more artists getting one degree, and then pursuing an entirely different career, not out of interest, but out of a need for a consistent income. Additionally, we now see fewer than 25% of young adults pursuing creative careers because of an apparent lack of security in the field. 

So where do all these creatives go? How do we navigate this new and seemingly treacherous landscape that is the working world? To put it simply, we have to pivot. The hard truth of today is that more and more media conglomerates will be bought by Salesforce CEOs or merged with major studios. The most practical solution is to make yourself known. Hitting easy applications and wishing for the best won’t set candidates apart. The best option is to network, create unique portfolios and think outside the box. Now more than ever, it’s important that creatives make themselves known because their importance has and will always be the backbone of any thriving world. 

Editor’s Note: The DePauw is an independently financed newspaper. Letters to the Editor reflect the thoughts and opinions of the author, and not necessarily those of The DePauw staff or editors. Letters to the Editor may be emailed to [email protected]. The DePauw reserves the right to refuse Letters to the Editor at the discretion of the editor-in-chief and faculty advisor.